I recently started working from home and I’m currently using my MacBook Pro 13 inch, which is great, but the small screen is bothering me. I’m considering either buying an iMac or just getting a second monitor, as I prefer working on two screens. However, I’m hesitating because iMacs are quite expensive, especially since I’ve already invested a lot in the MacBook. My job doesn’t require heavy apps; I usually just keep a lot of tabs open but don’t do any intensive programming. Any thoughts on this?
I use a 4K LG UltraFine monitor with my M2 MacBook Air and it’s brilliant. You should consider that option for flexibility between a desktop and portable setup.
My issue with iMacs is that monitors tend to last longer than the computers. I have a 2015 27" iMac with a 5K display, but it’s useless now because it can’t be used as a monitor with my newer Macs. I prefer a laptop with a separate monitor. Right now, I’m using a Dell 4K because 5Ks are just too expensive.
If Apple released a solid 5K 27" monitor for $1000 or less, I’d buy it in a heartbeat.
@Blake
There are driver boards from Aliexpress that can convert a 5K iMac into a fully functional external display with USB-C for charging and DisplayPort.
I did this with my 5K iMac and it works great!
@Jensen
I’ll definitely check that out! Thanks for the tip.
Blake said:
@Jensen
I’ll definitely check that out! Thanks for the tip.
Here’s a good discussion thread on MacRumors that covers everything you need to know: DIY 5k Monitor - success :-) | MacRumors Forums
@Jensen
Awesome, thanks again!
@Blake
Please send your useless computer my way! I can give it a good home!
I have a 2014, i5, 27" iMac that’s still running strong. It’s a bit outdated now, so I’m looking at upgrading to a 24’ M3 iMac. I say YES, the iMac is a solid machine and ‘Apple Silicon’ is impressive!
@Tal
Agreed! I’m excited to get the new M3 iMac soon! 
I faced the same dilemma last year: iMac versus MacBook + monitor. Ultimately, I chose the MacBook + monitor for the balance of portability and screen size.
I got a simple BenQ monitor since I don’t need top-notch quality for my work. It has an eye comfort feature that reduces blue light.
In the end, I’d suggest going for a monitor. iMacs seem better suited for families or as workplace setups.
I use a second-hand 4K monitor with my M2 MacBook Air and can’t see any reason to get an iMac. You’ve already invested in the processor, RAM, and storage of your MacBook. Why double your costs when you can find a decent used 4K monitor for under £100? Mine’s color accurate enough for my needs.
Yes.
It’s hard to beat the screen quality on an iMac for the price. You practically get a second computer for just a bit more than an equivalent monitor. If you don’t specifically need ‘Retina’ quality, there are plenty of less expensive monitors that would suffice.
I use two smaller 24” LG 4K displays with my 14” Pro. My point is that you don’t need the latest and greatest. These displays are over 3 years old each, and they’re excellent. If I had to choose just one, I would get a minimum of 27” though.
@Parker
Could you share the model number for your 24” 4K displays?
Abi said:
@Parker
Could you share the model number for your 24” 4K displays?
https://www.lg.com/us/business/computer-monitors/lg-24md4klb-b
I’ve set up an office at home with HP Z27k displays. They were among the only options offering single cable power delivery, USB hub, 4K, and Ethernet on the display at the time. Now, a few others are available.
They cost around $500 to $600, but having only one cable is a huge advantage. Just pack the included Apple power block and you’re all set.
Yes.
The Apple Studio Display is underrated.