[deleted]
I want a 45 inch.
Even my wife says I’m not normal.
43 inch 4k displays are cheap, I use a Sony 43 in X800. Crazy part is it’s 99% of DCI-P3, extremely low latency, and very wide viewing angles as it’s IPS.
Just wait for an M4 Mac Mini.
@Haven
That’s very good advice. I have a 40 inch television above my work desk but it’s mounted too high to use as a display. Even a 45 inch television is in the $300-$400 range these days.
Riley said:
@Haven
That’s very good advice. I have a 40 inch television above my work desk but it’s mounted too high to use as a display. Even a 45 inch television is in the $300-$400 range these days.
I even bought a monitor stand for it as it’s Vesa mount. I think it was $40? I lived a full year like an animal using the default legs then realized I could get monitor stands for it.
@Haven
This comment is empty, admin should fix
[deleted]
I want a 45 inch.
Even my wife says I’m not normal.
This comment is empty, admin should fix
Jo said:
24 inch? Nope.
24in is perfect for my kid (student), but no need for an upgrade.
M1 is plenty.
Jo said:
24 inch? Nope.
This comment is empty, admin should fix
no way jose, i’m good with the m1 air and a 2017 imac 5K, and my PC of course.
Weston said:
no way jose, i’m good with the m1 air and a 2017 imac 5K, and my PC of course.
Good for you! There is absolutely no need to upgrade often. Ride out what you got until the wheels fall off!
No, I would be getting a 4K 27 inch monitor instead to use with my MacBook which would be way more portable and useful for my daily life.
Vine said:
No, I would be getting a 4K 27 inch monitor instead to use with my MacBook which would be way more portable and useful for my daily life.
This comment is empty, admin should fix
Who uses a display less than 27" these days? Anything less is a major fail on Apple’s part. I’ll stick with a Mac Mini M2 Pro attached to my Studio Display.
Blaine said:
Who uses a display less than 27" these days? Anything less is a major fail on Apple’s part. I’ll stick with a Mac Mini M2 Pro attached to my Studio Display.
I use a 27 inch 4k monitor because I bought my first Macbook and my old 24" 1440p didn’t get along with MacOS, which refused to use scaling and 100% was way too tiny to read anything.
My 27" 4K DELL monitor is working fine, but I must say that I felt more confortable with the 24" one. I don’t need that extra size and in my workspace, 24" felt perfect.
@Luca
This comment is empty, admin should fix
Blaine said:
Who uses a display less than 27" these days? Anything less is a major fail on Apple’s part. I’ll stick with a Mac Mini M2 Pro attached to my Studio Display.
I have two 1440p 24" screen. I’m very happy with them. I’m not sure what the extra 3" would gain, but it would be at the expense of my second monitor.
@Tavi
yeah, I wanted to have a two 24" 1440p 144hz (or 165hz) setup for my desk (since it’s quite small) but I couldn’t find ANY monitors that fit that spec, and had to settle for a 27" instead
Blaine said:
Who uses a display less than 27" these days? Anything less is a major fail on Apple’s part. I’ll stick with a Mac Mini M2 Pro attached to my Studio Display.
Call me crazy but I’m gonna trust apple’s customer research over this sub
@Nyle
This comment is empty, admin should fix
Blaine said:
Who uses a display less than 27" these days? Anything less is a major fail on Apple’s part. I’ll stick with a Mac Mini M2 Pro attached to my Studio Display.
This comment is empty, admin should fix